A failed attempt: Sharks of the Corn (2021) breakdown.

Wiki Article

Are you prepared for an exciting ride through shark-infested cornfields? Strap yourself in, because "Sharks of the Corn" will provide you with sensational horror as well as comedy. The film was directed by the legendary Tim Ritter, this ultra low-budget flick draws on Stephen King's classic "Children of the Corn" (1984) which transforms into a hilarious and bizarre spoof that will leave you wondering what you're doing while rolling around having a good time.

Un Cornfield Carnival of Chaos

Beginning in an unassuming cornfield "Sharks of the Corn" is the first to reveal its unusual nature. The film introduces Gary and Susan and Susan, two people who quickly fade into the background as the film takes towards unexpected ways. The story weaves horror aspects with plenty of subplots. It's an enjoyable concoction that can only be described as a cornfield fair filled with chaos.

An Psychopathic Shark Enthusiast

In comes Teddy Bo Lucas, a character that adds an extra level of craziness to an already fascinating story. The psychopathic shark lover has an obsession that is unnatural with aquatic predators. And if that weren't enough bizarre, Teddy is taking his fascination to another level when they commit a shocking murder in his room at the motel. This surprising twist sets the scene for a storm of intrigue and mystery.

There is confusion. Cults as well as Sharks

The plot develops further as authorities pin the blame on poor Gary for Susan's murder, even though there is no motive. Meanwhile, a shark cult takes over as a distinct subplot. It introduces us another world where fields of corn and admiration for sharks meet. Just when you think that things can't get more bizarre then two inept burglars set out to snatch a shark's pup from this cult. It's an unpredictable (blog) mix of comedy and terror that keeps viewers on the edge.

Critiques and Comic Relief

While "Sharks of the Corn" has a refreshing and distinctive journey, the film is not without (blog) imperfections. It frequently switches between several characters and scenes leaving some viewers feeling disoriented or unable to grasp several plotlines. It's a deliberate stylistic choice which adds to the humorous aspect of the film but it may not be everybody's cup of tea.

The production standards of the film are intentionally low and the acting is in the category of unreliable. But, in the midst of weak performances, Steve Guynn shines through with his excellent performance. In fact, he is realizing his character instead of performing dialogue. This is a rare example of real acting in the midst of inflated performances.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines

"Sharks of the Corn" showcases its low-budget appeal with unpretentious effects that hold an appealing charm. Many of the sharks are hilariously presented by hand puppets. The effect adds the sense of humor to the film. The bizarre plot arc, which centers in a shark cult's plans to revive a python goddess that is where the story fully unleashes its artistic flair. The problem is that this creative thinking often can't be translated into an exciting enjoyment.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional

One aspect in which "Sharks of the Corn" fails is the cinematography. Visuals and framing are a bit rushed, coming in a tinier way, lacking the sharpness and elegance that you find on mainstream horror films. This could be a deliberate decision in keeping the look of low-budget films but it can affect the overall quality of the viewing experience.

In the end "Sharks of the Corn" is an acquired gastronomic experience. It's boring and slow hodgepodge of scenes that can be difficult to understand of. Low production values complicated plot lines, and poor acting might turn off certain viewers looking for a well-crafted horror comedy. If you're looking for uninspiring films for entertainment "Sharks of the Corn" isn't quite able to deliver comedy that is expected.

Final Rating one "Stock Footage Overlay" Out Five

Although the video itself is not of good quality, music, acting, and editing techniques "Sharks of the Corn" just doesn't meet the quality. Though it's an excellent and fantastically fun spoof film it doesn't deliver an integrated and enjoyable user experience. Since I am the reviewer, let me leave you with a lighthearted comment: films, like corn, can only be improved in the event that you throw explosions. However, "Sharks of the Corn" doesn't quite make the cut.

Report this wiki page